Oregon's Call for Change: The Journey of Initiative Petition 9 and Legislative Hesitancy

 

Navigating Oregon's Campaign Finance Waters: From Measure 107 to Initiative Petition 9

In the realm of Oregon politics, the quest for campaign finance reform has been a pressing issue, resonating deeply with its electorate. This was emphatically demonstrated with the passage of Measure 107, where a resounding 78% of Oregon voters voiced their desire for substantial changes in how campaign contributions are regulated. However, despite this clear mandate, the Oregon Legislature has remained notably inactive in translating this voter enthusiasm into concrete legislative action. This gap between public will and legislative inertia has given rise to Initiative Petition 9 (IP 9). 

Designed as a direct response to the Legislature's inaction, IP 9 embodies the collective aspiration of Oregonians to reform the way political campaigns are financed, striving to ensure a fairer and more transparent electoral process. As we delve into the journey of IP 9, we uncover a narrative of democratic engagement, legal challenges, and the unyielding spirit of Oregon's citizenry in their pursuit of a more accountable political landscape.

Legislative Resistance Despite Voter Support

Despite the overwhelming support for Measure 107, a clear mandate from the Oregon electorate for campaign finance reform, the response from the Oregon Legislature has been markedly tepid. This lack of momentum reflects a significant disconnect between the voters' aspirations and legislative action. Understanding the reasons behind this hesitancy is key. Legislators are tasked with navigating a complex array of competing interests and priorities, making the implementation of campaign finance rules a daunting challenge. Different factions within the legislature have differing views on how to best approach this reform, contributing to a lack of consensus and delay in action. 

Furthermore, these regulations require careful consideration to balance free speech rights with the need for transparency and fairness in political funding. The task involves intricate legal nuances and potential constitutional implications, making it a politically sensitive and legally intricate endeavor. This complexity, coupled with the diverse interests at play, has resulted in a legislative gridlock, with lawmakers struggling to devise a framework that satisfies the diverse stakeholders while adhering to the principles of effective and equitable campaign finance reform.

As a result, the path to achieving the goals set forth by Measure 107 remains mired in legislative uncertainty. This has led to frustration among many Oregonians who eagerly await the fulfillment of a promise made at the ballot box – a promise of a more transparent and equitable political process.

Here's How Initiative Petition 9 Can Fix These Issues

Initiative Petition 9 (IP 9) stands as a beacon of reform in Oregon's political landscape, emerging as a direct response to the Legislature's inaction following the approval of Measure 107. This petition is a reflection of the voters' will, aimed squarely at enhancing transparency and fairness in Oregon's political financing.

Key provisions of IP 9 include:

1. Contribution Limits: IP 9 proposes stringent caps on contributions to candidates, political committees, and political parties for both state and local government offices. It also seeks to ban contributions from for-profit corporations, ensuring that the electoral process is not unduly influenced by corporate interests.

2. Shining a Light on Dark Money: A central feature of IP 9 is its focus on transparency, particularly concerning 'dark money'. The initiative would require campaigns and dark money groups to disclose their largest funders in advertisements and reveal the original sources of their funds, thereby demystifying the source of political spending.

3. Additional Provisions for Integrity: Beyond the above listed provisions, IP 9 includes measures to remove exceptions in Oregon's bribery laws that legalize bribery with campaign contributions, limit the carry-over of funds from one election to another by candidates, and require more comprehensive campaign finance information in printed and online Voters' Pamphlets. It also proposes increased penalties for campaign finance violations and modifications to the system for enforcing these violations.

By laying out these provisions, IP 9 addresses the critical need for a cleaner, more accountable political system in Oregon, steering the state towards a future where political power is not merely a function of financial might but a reflection of the collective voice of its citizens.

The Current Landscape and Challenges Ahead

As IP 9 makes its way towards the 2024 ballot, it faces a political landscape fraught with challenges. Signature gathering, a crucial step in the process, demands considerable effort and resources, especially in a post-pandemic environment where traditional methods of canvassing may be less effective. 

Legislative and legal hurdles also loom. The Oregon Legislature's historical reluctance to enact robust campaign finance reform indicates potential resistance, and legal complexities could arise, given the complicated nature of campaign finance laws.

Amidst these challenges, the urgency of IP 9 grows. Recent campaigns in Oregon have seen record-breaking expenditures, underlining the substantial influence of wealthy interests in state politics. This trend underscores the critical need for IP 9, aiming to ensure that the political voice of the average Oregonian is not drowned out by the financial clout of a few. As the 2024 ballot approaches, the impetus lies in overcoming these hurdles to actualize a vision of more equitable and transparent political financing in Oregon.

Oregon's Governor's Races are listed above. In 2022, the cost was over $70 Million.

Now is the Time for Action

The journey of IP 9 is not just a political campaign; it's a movement for the people of Oregon to reclaim their democratic voice. Your support is crucial. Engage with this reform by volunteering for signature gathering efforts, which is vital for getting IP 9 on the 2024 ballot. Educate others about the importance of this measure and the impact of campaign finance on our political system. Share information, participate in community discussions, and encourage friends and family to get involved. Every signature, every conversation, and every informed voter brings us closer to a more equitable and transparent political process in Oregon. Join this movement and be a part of shaping a fairer future for Oregon's democracy.

We Need Your Help

Please consider donating to the Support Petition 9 Campaign. You'll help us get Initiative 9 on the ballot, which will help us create an Oregon we're all happy to call home. Join us in the mission to create a political landscape that truly represents the people of Oregon. Every contribution, big or small, brings us closer to our goal.

Oregon offers an income tax credit for qualifying Oregon tax filers who contribute to qualifying state, federal or local political campaigns. The total credit is limited to $100 on a joint return or $50 on a single or separate return. Please see the Oregon Secretary of State for details. Contributions or gifts to this campaign are not tax-deductible for federal income tax purposes.

Cited Sources and more details can be found at the following:

Honest Elections Oregon. (n.d.). IP 9 Summary. Retrieved from https://www.honest-elections.com/ip9summary
Honest Elections Oregon. (n.d.). Petition 9. Retrieved from https://www.honest-elections.com/petition9
Jaquiss, N. (2023). Good government groups are pushing campaign finance limits in Oregon. They might have competition. OPB. Retrieved from https://www.opb.org/article/2023/08/09/oregon-campaign-finance-reform-ballot-measures/
Jaquiss, N. (2021). Measure 107 allows campaign finance limits in Oregon. OPB. Retrieved from https://www.opb.org/article/2021/10/29/measure-107-oregon-campaign-finance-limits/
OregonLive. (2022, November). Political donors spent more than $70 million on Oregon governor's race. Retrieved from https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2022/11/political-donors-spent-more-than-70-million-on-oregon-governors-race.html

Why Oregon Needs a Constitutional Amendment for Political Financing and Anti-Bribery Laws

Oregon's political landscape is at a crucial juncture. With the State Integrity Investigation in 2015 grading Oregon an "F" in systems to prevent corruption, particularly in political financing, the need for a constitutional amendment addressing political financing and anti-bribery laws has never been more pressing. This article delves into why such an amendment is vital for the integrity and health of Oregon's political system.

The Current State of Political Financing in Oregon

Oregon's lax laws on political financing have led to a system where the influence of money in politics is rampant. The state’s ranking as the second-worst in the nation in controlling "Political Financing" is a clear indicator that the existing framework is insufficient in ensuring fair and transparent electoral processes.

The Risks of Unchecked Political Financing

Unregulated political financing opens the door to a multitude of risks, including:

Undue Influence of Wealthy Donors: Large donations can lead to a disproportionate influence of wealthy individuals and organizations in political decisions.

Erosion of Public Trust: When elections are perceived to be influenced by money, public trust in the democratic process diminishes.

Barriers to Diverse Representation: High campaign costs can prevent potential candidates from diverse backgrounds from running for office.

The Role of Anti-Bribery Laws

While Oregon has standard laws against bribery, the intertwining of large political donations and policy decisions often blurs the lines between legal contributions and bribery. Stronger anti-bribery laws would:

Clarify Legal Boundaries: Clear definitions of what constitutes bribery in political contexts help maintain ethical standards in governance.

Deter Corruption: Stricter penalties and clearer laws act as a deterrent to corrupt practices.

Promote Accountability: Enhancing anti-bribery laws ensures that public officials are accountable for their actions.

The Need for a Constitutional Amendment

A constitutional amendment is a powerful tool because:

Long-term Stability: Amendments provide a more stable and enduring solution than regular legislative changes, which can be easily overturned.

Public Involvement: Amending the constitution typically involves public input and referendum, ensuring that the changes reflect the will of the people.

Comprehensive Reform: An amendment can address both political financing and anti-bribery laws in a cohesive manner, tackling the issues at their root.

The Path Forward

Oregon needs a constitutional amendment to fundamentally reform its approach to political financing and anti-bribery laws. This requires:

Public Awareness and Advocacy: Educating the public about the importance of this issue and mobilizing support for change.

Collaboration Across the Aisle: Bipartisan support is crucial for such a significant change.

Inclusive Dialogue: Ensuring that diverse voices, especially those who have been marginalized in the political process, are part of the conversation.

Conclusion

Oregon stands at a crossroads. The adoption of a constitutional amendment focusing on political financing and anti-bribery laws is not just a legal necessity but a moral imperative. Such an amendment would be a significant step towards restoring integrity, fairness, and trust in Oregon’s political system, ensuring that it serves the interests of all its citizens, not just the few with deep pockets.

Dan Meek's Vision for Honest Elections in Oregon: A Discussion on KBOO Community Radio

Introduction

On KBOO Community Radio's "Keeping it Real," host Lisa Loving engaged in a crucial conversation with Dan Meek, a renowned public interest attorney and key figure in the Honest Elections Oregon initiative. The topic: Initiative Petition 9 and its potential to revolutionize campaign finance in Oregon.

The Drive for Change: Initiative Petition 9

Initiative Petition 9 is more than a policy proposal; it's a call for a fundamental shift in Oregon's political landscape. As Meek elaborated, this ballot initiative aims to establish actual limits on campaign contributions, a move that could dramatically alter how elections are funded and conducted in the state. The stakes are high, and the need for reform is clear.

The Role of Public Involvement

Gathering enough signatures to place Initiative Petition 9 on the 2024 ballot is a significant challenge. Organizers need to collect 180,000 signatures, a feat that requires widespread public engagement and support. Meek's discussion on KBOO emphasized the importance of grassroots involvement in bringing this initiative to life.

What's at Stake?

If successful, Initiative Petition 9 could set a precedent not only in Oregon but across the United States. By imposing strict limits on campaign contributions, Oregon can lead the way in promoting a more equitable and democratic electoral process where the voice of every citizen carries weight, irrespective of financial clout.

Conclusion

The conversation between Lisa Loving and Dan Meek on KBOO's "Keeping it Real" sheds light on a critical moment in Oregon's political history. Initiative Petition 9 represents a bold step towards curbing money's influence in politics, ensuring that elections are decided by the power of ideas rather than the power of the purse. As Meek articulated, the success of this initiative depends on the active participation of Oregonians who believe in the integrity of their electoral system. 

You can listen to the interview here: Keeping It Real, Lisa Loving and Dan Meek

The Transformative Impact of Campaign Finance Reform in Oregon

Introduction

In recent years, Oregon has been at the forefront of a significant shift towards greater transparency and equity in political campaign financing. The push for campaign finance reform, embodied by hashtags like #OregonCampaignReform and #FinanceReformOR, is not just a political movement but a call for a more democratic and accountable electoral process. This blog delves into the profound impact these reforms are having on Oregon's political landscape.

The Need for Reform: #MoneyOutPoliticsOR

For decades, the influence of money in politics has been a growing concern. In Oregon, the rallying cry of #MoneyOutPoliticsOR has echoed across the state, highlighting the need for a system where elections are not merely contests of financial might. Campaign finance reform is a crucial step towards ensuring that elected officials are responsive to their constituents, not just their largest donors.

Promoting Transparency: #ORFinanceTransparency

One of the pillars of the campaign finance reform movement in Oregon is the drive for transparency, captured by the hashtag #ORFinanceTransparency. Transparency in campaign finance means voters have clear insights into who is funding political campaigns and how that money is being spent. This level of openness is essential for a healthy democracy, as it helps prevent undue influence and corruption.

Empowering Small Donors: #FairFundingOR

A key component of Oregon's finance reform is the emphasis on small donor contributions, a movement encapsulated by #FairFundingOR. This approach aims to reduce the disproportionate influence of large donors and corporate PACs, empowering everyday citizens in the political process. By amplifying the voices of smaller donors, Oregon is working towards a more equitable and representative electoral system.

Impact on Elections: #TransparentElectionsOregon

The hashtag #TransparentElectionsOregon reflects the aspiration for elections that genuinely represent the will of the people. Campaign finance reform has the potential to change the dynamics of electoral campaigns, making them less about financial muscle and more about the issues that matter to voters. This shift can lead to more competitive races and a wider diversity of candidates, ultimately strengthening democracy.

Challenges and Future Directions: #AccountablePoliticsOR

While the progress in Oregon has been commendable, the journey towards fully accountable politics, as highlighted by #AccountablePoliticsOR, is ongoing. The challenges include legal battles, political resistance, and the continuous evolution of campaign financing methods. Yet, the commitment to reform remains strong among Oregonians.

Conclusion

Campaign finance reform in Oregon, a cause championed by many, including those rallying behind #OregonForFairCampaigns, is more than a legislative agenda. It's a movement towards a more equitable, transparent, and democratic political process. As Oregon continues to lead the way, the impact of these reforms will be watched and potentially emulated by other states seeking to restore integrity and fairness in their own political systems.

#DemocracyNotDollarsOR

By embracing the spirit of #DemocracyNotDollarsOR, Oregon is setting a powerful example of how states can take tangible steps towards reducing the outsized influence of money in politics, ensuring that the voices of all citizens, regardless of their economic status, are heard and valued in the political arena.

Bringing Honesty to Elections: Unpacking Oregon’s IP 9 Initiative for Campaign Finance Reform

Oregon stands on the cusp of a pivotal change, with the IP9 Initiative aimed at restructuring the very fabric of political campaigning in the state. Spearheaded by Honest Elections Oregon, this initiative is a clarion call for transparency, fairness, and equity in electoral processes.

Contribution Limits

IP 9 proposes stringent contribution limits to candidates, PACs, and political parties, thereby mitigating the undue influence of monetary contributions on electoral outcomes. In a groundbreaking move, it bans contributions by for-profit corporations, thus ensuring that political power isn’t concentrated in the hands of a few.

Disclosure Requirements

Transparency is the cornerstone of any democracy. The initiative mandates that significant campaign contributors or independent spenders report on ORESTAR, each source providing over $5,000 per year for political advertisements. This move aims to unveil the shadowy figures behind political funding, shedding light on ‘dark money’ and its influence.

Protecting Democracy

Other significant provisions of IP 9 include the removal of exceptions for campaign contributions in defining bribery of public officials and limitations on candidates' carry-over of funds, preventing incumbents from amassing intimidating war chests. These measures safeguard the sanctity of political competition, ensuring a level playing field for all aspirants.

Enforcement and Penalties

IP9 introduces stricter penalties for campaign finance violations and modifies the enforcement system, allowing final decisions to be subject to judicial review. These robust mechanisms will hold violators accountable, reinforcing the credibility of Oregon’s electoral system.

Conclusion

The passage of IP9 is a step towards a more transparent, equitable, and honest political environment in Oregon. By supporting this initiative, we are not just reforming campaign finance but reaffirming our commitment to democracy. Join Honest Elections Oregon in championing this cause – sign the petition for Campaign Finance Reform and be part of the change.

Don’t let the voices of Oregonians be drowned out by dark money. Please stand with us for transparent and honest elections. 

#OregonCampaignFinanceReform #IP9Initiative #HonestElectionsOregon

Ensuring Transparent Political Funding in Oregon: A Call to Action

Introduction

The integrity of our democratic process hinges on transparency and accountability, especially regarding campaign financing. In Oregon, we pride ourselves on our progressive values and commitment to fair play, and it’s time we turn our attention to a crucial issue that affects us all: Campaign Finance Reform. This blog post is a rallying cry to my fellow Oregonians, particularly local business leaders who have a pivotal role in bringing about change. 

Understanding the Need for Reform

Transparent political funding is not just a buzzword; it is the foundation of a healthy democracy. When political contributions are made in the shadows, it becomes difficult to hold elected officials accountable, and the voice of the average citizen is drowned out by big money. This is different from the Oregon we want to live in.

Local business leaders, as a demographic, have significant influence in our state, and it’s time to use that influence for the greater good. By championing campaign finance reform, we can ensure a level playing field for all candidates, regardless of their financial backing, and restore trust in our electoral process.

The Role of Transparent Political Funding

Transparent political funding means that every dollar donated to a political campaign is accounted for and made public. This allows voters to see exactly who is supporting a candidate and helps to prevent undue influence from wealthy donors and corporations.

In Oregon, we have the opportunity to lead the nation in campaign finance reform, but we can only do it with your support. That’s why we’re asking for your help to get enough signatures to have our petition accepted and Initiative 9 on the ballot in November 2024.

Taking Action Together

It’s time to stand up for what is right and ensure a transparent, accountable political process in Oregon. Here’s how you can help:

1. Sign the Petition: Add your name to the growing list of Oregonians calling for campaign finance reform. Every signature brings us closer to getting Initiative 9 on the ballot.

2. Spread the Word: Talk to your friends, family, and colleagues about the importance of transparent political funding. Use your influence to raise awareness and garner support.

3. Volunteer: Join our team of dedicated volunteers working on the ground to collect signatures and mobilize voters.

4. Donate: Support our efforts financially, ensuring we have the resources we need to make our campaign a success.

Conclusion

The time for change is now. By advocating for transparent political funding, we can create a more equitable and just political system in Oregon—one where every citizen’s voice is heard and our elected officials are held accountable. So, let’s come together, take action, and make history. Help us put Initiative 9 on the ballot and bring campaign finance reform to Oregon.

More Information:

Donate Volunteer Visit our LinkTree

5 Overwhelming Influences of Corporate Money in Politics: A Cry from the Heart of Political Activists

In the sprawling landscape of modern politics, voices of individual citizens often echo with a sense of diminishing resonance. For us, political activists dedicated to the cause of campaign finance reform, the towering shadow of corporate money feels not just daunting but overwhelming. 

Our concern isn't just a theoretical debate – it's a palpable, daily struggle against a tide that seems insurmountable.

1. The Magnitude of the Issue:

The influence of corporate money in politics has grown exponentially over the years. Large corporations, with their deep pockets, have found ways to funnel vast amounts into campaigns, dwarfing individual contributions and, in many cases, dictating the narrative of entire elections.

2. The Challenge to Democracy:

A Shift in Loyalty: The inherent danger of unchecked corporate contributions is the potential shift in loyalty. Instead of elected officials prioritizing the needs and voices of their constituents, there's a looming risk that they become more responsive to the desires of their largest financial backers.

Erosion of Trust: This disproportionate influence creates a rift between the electorate and their representatives. It leads to skepticism, where decisions made in office are viewed through a lens of doubt, questioning whether they were for public good or corporate benefit.

3. The Overwhelming Feeling:

As activists, our journey is filled with passionate rallies, grassroots campaigns, and educational drives. But facing the tidal wave of corporate funds:

David vs. Goliath: The battle often feels like a mismatch. While grassroots movements gather pennies and dimes, corporations write checks with many zeros. The disparity is not just monetary but also in the outreach and influence that money can buy.

Drowning Voices: It's disheartening to witness genuine concerns of everyday citizens getting overshadowed by the louder, amplified messages funded by corporate money.

4. The Silver Lining:

Despite the challenges, our resolve has never wavered. And there are reasons for hope:

Growing Awareness: The very fact that campaign finance reform has become a mainstream issue shows that people are waking up to the realities and demanding change.

Successful Movements: States and municipalities across the country have started enacting campaign finance reforms, proving that change, while slow, is possible.

5. Our Continued Fight:

Our strategy as activists needs to be multifaceted:

Educate and Engage: It's imperative to continuously educate the public about the repercussions of unchecked corporate influence in politics.

Support Reform Candidates: Backing candidates who prioritize campaign finance reform can bring about legislative changes from within.

Build Alliances: Forming coalitions with other like-minded groups can amplify our collective voice and resources.

Conclusion:

The feeling of being overwhelmed is real, but so is our commitment. In the face of the giant that is corporate money in politics, we stand firm, united by the belief that democracy should represent all voices equally. We've embarked on this journey not because it's easy, but because it's necessary. To all fellow activists, let's remember: every tidal wave begins with a single ripple. Let's be that ripple.

Oregon's Push for Transparent Politics: The Need for Campaign Reform

A significant movement is on the rise in the heart of Oregon politics. Citizens are increasingly concerned about the transparency of campaign money and the accurate funding sources behind political advertisements. As the state gears up for the next election season, there is a growing sentiment that the true spirit of democracy is under threat.

Political spenders, including Political Action Committees (PACs) and other entities, play an enormous role in influencing the decisions and views of our elected representatives. And while these groups have the right to participate in our political system, the voters are calling for more clarity on the sources of money. There is a rising demand to understand who's behind the curtain – who are the principal funders, and what are their intentions?

This call for clarity is about more than understanding who supports which candidate or cause. It delves deeper into "dark money" concerns – undisclosed or hidden financial support that clouds the political landscape. There have been instances where funders, hiding behind the veil of anonymity, pump vast amounts of money into campaigns. This leaves voters wondering: Whose interests are being served?

Laurel Hamers, University Communications at the University of Oregon, highlights the need for more profound awareness of campaign finance laws in Oregon and the United States. In an article from July 2023, Hamers writes, "In the United States, campaign finance laws limit the size of donations from individuals. But certain nonprofits can offer a way around those rules. Specifically, 501(c)(4) — nonprofits that promote social welfare — are allowed to participate in political activities, including lobbying. But they aren't required to disclose their donors." This is what Petition Initiative 9 seeks to resolve.

Moreover, there's an increasing demand for stringent contribution limits. Oregonians believe that limits on political contributions, especially from corporate entities, are essential to prevent undue influence on local government office bearers and those in statewide office. The intent is clear: to ensure that the people's voice isn't drowned out by the sound of money.

Recent incidents have also brought to light loopholes in Oregon's bribery laws, creating a pressing need for reform. An election should be a level playing field, free from the influence of carry-over funds that allow incumbents to build war chests, potentially discouraging worthy challengers.

But hope is on the horizon. The state is witnessing a push towards making campaign finance information more accessible, with a stronger emphasis on including this data in Voters' Pamphlets. Additionally, there are talks about introducing sterner penalties for campaign finance violations, coupled with an improved enforcement system that ensures unbiased judgments.

In essence, Oregon stands at a crossroads.

As political spenders and PACs continue to play their game, the voters demand a system where politics is clean, transparent, and, most importantly, representative of the people's will. It's time to bring about the change Oregonians deserve, ensuring a future where our political landscape is not just about who has the deepest pockets but about who has the state's best interests at heart.

Please join us by filling out a signature page. Donations are always needed, and you can always sign up for any jobs listed on our Most Needed Volunteers list. Lastly, stay engaged through our Honest Elections Oregon Newsletter.

Stay in touch with us on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, where we list calendar events, updates on our efforts, and continued commentary about why Petition Initiative 9 are so crucial to the future of political action in Oregon.

Cite:

Hamers, L. (2023, July 14). Financial transparency index helps track “Dark money” in politics. Financial transparency index helps track “dark money” in politics | Around the O. https://around.uoregon.edu/content/financial-transparency-index-helps-track-dark-money-politics

Letter to Editor of The Oregonian

The government of Oregon is being captured by big money.  Candidates for Governor spent over $80 million on their campaigns, doubling  the previous record of $40 million and 40-fold the amount spent in 1998.  Candidates for the Oregon Legislature spent over $41 million also setting a new record.  This does not count the portion of the $14 million spent by the "leadership committees" of the Democrats and Republican caucuses in the Oregon Legislature that was not contributed directly to candidates.

The top 10 Oregon Senate candidates spent an average of $1.5 million each; they spent around $50 per vote.  The top 10 Oregon House candidates spent an average of $867,000 each; they spent nearly $60 per vote.  One man alone contributed $5.25 million to candidates for Oregon Governor this year.

Oregon is one of 5 states with no enforced limits on campaign contributions.  The result is that Oregon campaigns are among the most expensive in the United States, making candidates dependent on and beholden to their huge donors.

Voters should demand that the Oregon Legislature, with Governor-elect Tina Kotek, enact effective campaign finance reform, including limits on campaign contributions and requiring that political ads name their largest funders.

Dan Meek
Volunteer, Honest Elections Oregon
honest-elections.com

Credit to Hillary Borrud and The Oregonian for the charts on donors to the candidates for Governor.

This Election Proves Oregon Badly Needs Campaign Finance Reform

 The government of Oregon is being captured by big money.  So far over $75 million has been raised for the 2022 campaigns for Governor ($68 million by the top 3 candidates), beating the previous record of $40 million.  Over $48 million has been contributed for seats in the Oregon Legislature, beating the previous record of $35 million.  No doubt the final totals for 2022 will be higher.

The average person has no realistic chance to earn a seat in the Oregon Legislature.  The campaigns of the top 10 Oregon Senate candidates now have spent an average of $1.3 million each.  A Senate win typically requires about 30,000 votes, so the candidates are spending over $40 per vote.  The campaigns of the top 10 Oregon House candidates now have spent an average of $745,000 each.  A House win typically requires about 15,000 votes, so the candidates are spending about $50 per vote.

One man alone has contributed $5.25 million to candidates for Oregon Governor this year.

Oregon is one of 5 states with no limits on campaign contributions.  The result is that Oregon campaigns are among the most expensive in the United States, making candidates dependent on and beholden to their huge donors.

It is crucial that candidates for public office take a stand for campaign contribution limits and disclosure requirements.  Honest Elections Oregon distributed to all candidates for Governor and the Oregon Legislature.  Of the candidates running in the general election, 87 responded and 104 did not, despite numerous emails and phone calls to every campaign.

27 earn A’s - 23 earn B’s - 4 earn C’s - 9 earn D’s - 104 earn F’s

Voters should respect the candidates who responded and who earned high marks.  They should shun candidates who refused to respond or indicated no support for campaign finance reform.

Here again are the links to see the grades of those who responded and the identities of those who did not:  https://bit.ly/orcandsurvey and  https://bit.ly/candsilent.

Honest Elections Oregon concluded:

• Measure 107 (2020) amended the Oregon Constitution to explicitly allow limits on campaign contributions and requirements that political ads name their largest funders. Despite 78% of Oregon voters approving Measure 107 (2020), many candidates remain unwilling to publicly announce where they stand. 87 candidates completed the survey in this first year, while 104 did not. [The results table omits candidates who responded but were eliminated in the primary election.]

• Candidates for the Oregon Legislature who earned A+ were Jeff Golden of Ashland, Ashley Pelton of Cottage Grove, Walt Trandum of Sandy, and John Lively of Springfield.

• Only two general election candidates for Governor responded: Tina Kotek (Democrat, earned a B) and L. Leon Noble (Libertarian, earned a D).  All others earned Fs for not responding.

Points were assigned for answers consistent with Honest Elections Oregon priorities, including capping campaign contributions and clearer disclosure rules, including a requirement that political ads name their 4 largest actual funders (not just nice-sounding names of committees). Grades range from A+ for the best answers to D for the worst.

We urge voters to read the ratings and vote accordingly.

Dan Meek
Volunteer, Honest Elections Oregon
honest-elections.com

Willamette Week Article on Tina Kotek's Claim to Take Contribution Limits Seriously

Oregon’s Wealthiest Man Has Caused Tina Kotek to Take Contribution Limits Seriously—or at Least Claim She Does

October 12, 2022

Tina Kotek, the Democratic nominee locked in a dead heat in the Oregon governor’s race, took time out from campaigning Oct. 10 to hold a “roundtable on campaign finance reform.” The event was occasioned by Nike co-founder Phil Knight writing Kotek’s Republican opponent, Christine Drazan, a check for $1 million on Oct. 6.

“Oregon is in danger of flipping red due to the influx of large donations from billionaires and corporate special interests looking to influence the election,” Kotek’s campaign wrote in an email publicizing the roundtable.

There’s some irony in Kotek’s newfound interest in limiting campaign contributions.

First, despite Knight’s check, Kotek led Drazan as of Oct. 10 in total fundraising: $16 million to $14.5 million.

Second, as the longest-serving House speaker in Oregon history (nine years, ending in January 2022), Kotek demonstrated a steely efficiency at passing difficult bills—except ones that would limit campaign contributions.

Will Democrats Ever Wake Up to the Need for Campaign Finance Reform in Oregon?

 Now that Phil Knight (retired from Nike) has contributed $3.75 million to Betsy Johnson (NAV) and $1 million to Christine Drazen (R), the Democrats appear to be waking up to the need for campaign finance reform in Oregon.  Too late.

The Democrats have been in control of the Oregon Legislature since 2007 (except for the even split in 2011) and have controlled the Governor's Office since 1987.  They have adopted zero limits on campaign contributions and almost entirely meaningless tagline requirements on political advertisements (after repealing Oregon's previous tagline requirements in 2001).

Now the Democrats are being outspent 2-1 in the Governor's race by the opponents.  All rely heavily on gigantic contributions.

HEO Surveys Candidates on Campaign Finance Reform

HEO Surveys Candidates on Campaign Finance Reform

Survey Shows Most Oregon Candidates are Ignoring Voter Demands for Campaign Finance Reform.

While there are a few champions of campaign finance reform (CFR) among Oregon candidates for statewide or legislative office, most declined to answer the survey or expressed views inconsistent with the wishes of Oregon voters.

“Even though Oregon voters have overwhelmingly voted for campaign finance reform, including in 2020, Oregon legislators have not adopted contribution limits or meaningful disclosure requirements,” said Mindy Lowden of Wolf-PAC Oregon.

Honest Elections Oregon (HEO) surveyed the positions on campaign finance reform issues of all 2022 candidates for Governor and the Oregon Legislature. 37 candidates responded to the survey. Here are their answers.

HEO then evaluated their answers, assigning points for answers that are consistent with the goals of HEO. HEO then applied a grading scale ranging from A+ for the best answers to D for the worst, reserving F for the candidates who did not respond to the survey, despite repeated requests by email and phone over a period of several weeks. Here are the grades of those who responded.

For more information, see Report on Candidate Survey. It details the survey purpose, procedure, responses, scoring, and analysis, with tables for each respondent’s answers and scores and list of non-respondents.​​​

Read More about the Survey 

Our 2022 Initiative Petitions are Dead

The Oregon Supreme Court on March 29, 2022, finally denied our mandamus petition to to overrule the Secretary of State’s unprecedented and unlawful rejection of Initiative Petitions 43, 44, and 45.  The Court declined to say whether we are right or wrong; just that mandamus is an extraordinary remedy.

So Now We Focus on a Statewide Initiative for 2024
Stay Tuned

In 2022, we will also ask all statewide and legislative candidates in Oregon to state their positions on real campaign finance reform in Oregon, including contribution limits and requirements that political ads name their largest funders.  We will publish those results on this website.

Honest Elections Files Mandamus Action against Secretary of State in Oregon Supreme Court

February 16, 2022 --- Campaign finance reformers today filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asking the Oregon Supreme Court to overrule the Secretary of State’s unprecedented rejection of Initiative Petitions 43, 44, and 45, which is based on misinterpretation of the Oregon Constitution: “The full text of the proposed measure was not included.” No other Oregon Secretary of State has required including in an initiative petition the text of subsections of existing law that are not changed by the proposed measure.

See full Press Release.

The Oregonian editorializes for Honest Elections Oregon's effort to get campaign finance reform on the November 2022 ballot

 The Oregonian editorializes for Honest Elections Oregon's effort to get campaign finance reform on the November 2022 ballot:

The print edition on February 13 stated:  "Secretary of State Shemia Fagan, who has benefited from millions in union donations, disqualified three campaign-finance petitions that seek to impose donation caps.  Oregonians tired of the outsized power of big money in Oregon elections should hop the petitioners' efforts to reinstate the petitions prevail at the Oregon Supreme Court, the editorial board writes."

Honest Elections Testifies at Oregon Senate Hearing

Dan Meek testified for Honest Elections Oregon at the hearing of the Senate Rules Committee of the Oregon Legislature on campaign finance reform bills.  TESTIMONY HERE

Oregon Attorney General Issues Certified Ballot Titles for All 3 of Our Initiative Petitions

Disregarding the incorrect decision of the Secretary of State to reject our initiative petitions, Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum  on February 9 issued certified ballot titles for all 3 petitions.  Her office also disputed Secretary Fagan's statement that she based her decision on advice from the Attorney General.

​So our initiatives are not dead!

Campaign Finance Reform Advocates Outraged at Secretary of State's Rejection of their Ballot Measures

Secretary of State Shemia Fagan Cancels Initiatives for No Valid Reason

Statement of Honest Elections Oregon (Feb. 9, 2022):

Supporters of real campaign finance reform in Oregon are outraged by the action of Secretary of State Shemia Fagan today to disqualify all serious campaign finance reform initiative petitions. Any of them would:

• establish political campaign contribution limits 

• require that political advertisements name their largest funders 

• require faster and more complete public disclosure of campaign spending, including "dark money"

There is no valid legal basis for refusing to allow the gathering of signatures on these initiatives (Petitions 43, 44, and 45). All of them satisfy all criteria in the Oregon Constitution and laws. The Honest Elections Oregon coalition will on Friday ask the Oregon Supreme Court in a mandamus action to require Secretary Fagan to allow the initiatives to obtain voter signatures. A total of 112,020 verified registered voter signatures must be submitted by July 8.

Contrary to the Secretary's suggestion that the campaign finance reform advocates "start over" after correcting what she claims is a technical error (15 words in petitions that range from 11,000 to 16,000 words), the ballot title process has built-in delays for government actions that consume at least 4 months. Starting over now would mean not being about to start collecting the 112,020 required signatures until early June--leaving only about one month, which is not enough.

Unless the Oregon Supreme Court issues such an order promptly, the window for gathering enough signatures will have closed, and Secretary Fagan's decision will preclude all statewide campaign finance reform initiatives until November 2024.